Kim Kardashian’s bottom
Posted By Inflate123 on July 13, 2009
I don’t really follow the celebrity thing; I don’t watch reality shows of people who are famous for being famous. But you can’t really ignore it, and sooner or later you find yourself aware of someone — like, say, Kim Kardashian — whose name you know but whose fame you cannot explain.
I had heard her name enough that I finally searched online and found that she has a whopping great posterior. In every sense of the word.
Now, I’m not a butt man. I’m an hourglass guy. I don’t want 36-24-36 — I’m an inflation fetishist. I want 46-24-46 and let’s see where things go from there. So when I saw this photo promoting Kim’s new fitness DVD, I noticed.
Belt plus lycra times curves equals helloooooooo Kim.
So naturally, I’m thinking, could there be more? There could. Here’s a paparazzi shot of her in a Halloween costume:
Same formula as before, actually, with a bonus multiplier for the corset top.
But then I found an image that made me doubt reality. I mean, it’s real, it’s another paparazzi shot, but it can’t be real…can it?
God DAMN. If that’s not a real-life inflatable woman, I don’t know what is.
Turns out the answer is that the photo is both real and not real. Yes, that’s really her ass, and yes it’s really in holographic tights. But it’s not real in that, if you study the right side of her rear (and I do invite you to linger as long as you like in the name of academia), you’ll see that it’s difficult to distinguish where her black bottoms end and the shadow from the photographer’s flash begins. If you go into an image editing program and monkey with the levels, you can see the bottom line.
But why would you want to? Enjoy that optical illusion. All I needed was to repeat the phrase “That’s not Photoshopped” to myself and I was pleasantly suspending disbelief.
Comments